VOTE NO: Current Orchard Station Zoning already allows for TWICE Alberta’s Densest Mall

There are many issues with amending the GV Comprehensive Plan and the massive 3.3 million square foot development that Alberta Development Partners proposed last summer. However, the biggest is density (no pun intended) because it will bring: 1) large increases in traffic (potentially 27,000 incremental car trips per daytwice a sold out Nuggets game) and 2) significant increases in building height (max of 5 stories today vs. 200 feet (the height of the Landmark) under the proposed Orchard Station Subarea.

I have heard people argue that the developer needs the increased density to generate an acceptable rate of return. The current zoning and Comp Plan governing Orchard Station already provide for significantly more development opportunity than Alberta has required in its other developments; suggesting there is more than enough opportunity to generate a reasonable return.

Alberta can currently develop just under 1.2 million of mixed-use square feet on its 24 acres in Orchard Station. That works out to current development capacity of 48,708 sqft per acre.

The HIGHEST DENSITY mall that Alberta has developed is the Simi Valley Town Center in California (based on information I found on its website). The Simi Valley Town Center is 637,728 square feet on 27.1 acres, which works out to 23,532 sqft per acre.

The current Comp Plan and Orchard Station zoning ALREADY allow for twice the density of Alberta’s highest density mall. Isn’t this enough?

The Simi Valley Town Center is described on Alberta’s website,

“The redevelopment of Simi Valley Town Center will bring an enhanced mix of retailers including a specialty grocer, an array of unique dining options and specialized shops. Locals will gather to enjoy comfortable and shaded seating areas, a communal fire pit, an interactive children’s play area and fountain, and enriched colorful landscaping.”

Alberta Development Orchard Station Density Comparison SqFt per Acre Small with Simi - 05-20-17

The Simi Valley amenities sound similar to those desired by people in favor of changing the Comprehensive Plan at a much more reasonable scale. Simi Valley is just one example of why the Greenwood Village Comprehensive Plan does not need to be changed and why last summer’s proposal by Alberta Development was so outrageous.

Click here for the full chart comparing Alberta’s original proposal to what is allowed today and other Alberta developments in Colorado.

Please VOTE NO before JUNE 6.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s